In a September 2020 TV ad, correspondent Tom Malinowski stated that he “does not take corporate PAC money, so they do not own it”. In the months that followed, the New Jersey Democrats silently received thousands of dollars from business interest groups and corporate lobbying giants.
During his 2020 congressional run, Malinowski often Touted His “no-corporate PAC commitment,” arguing that the self-imposed ban would allow him to “make decisions based solely on what he thinks is right for his elements.” Over the past 18 months, however, Malinowski has received approximately 43,000 from various business interest groups, corporate lobbying firms, and independent corporate lobbyists, according to a federal campaign statement. Washington Free Beacon Display
Democrats in the House and Senate use loopholes to receive promotional cash from corporate-funded groups when swearing in corporate money – mostly from congressional congressional leadership committees that are bankrolled by corporations. While this is true of Malinowski, who has received at least $ 200,000 from leading PACs since September 2020, the New Jersey Democrats have taken customs one step further by receiving contributions from business interest groups and corporate lobbying firms. By doing so, Malinowski has taken from thousands of groups who seek to influence Congress for their business interests, a practice Democrats have sworn to claim.
Since October 2020, for example, Malinowski’s Winning Strategy has received more than $ 10,000 from lobbying groups such as Washington and Nelson Mullins. Companies represent an array of top corporations, including BP, Google, and Comcast. Also, since September 2020, Malinowski has received more than $ 22,000 from business and professional interest groups, such as the American Council of Engineering Companies and the National Confectioners Association, which represents candy makers and spent about $ 500,000 to lobby the federal government in 2021.
Malinowski’s desire to take campaign cash from these sources of particular interest contradicts his claim that he is not affiliated with corporate donors. In September 2020, Malinowski Dismissed Republican Who criticized his corporate cash acceptance through the leadership committee, claiming that since he did not take money directly from a corporation, there was no reason for him to feel “indebted” to the main source of funding. But Malinowski did not mention his lucrative relationship with the business interest group, and did not return requests for his campaign comments.
In addition to Malinowski’s decision to accept contributions from business groups and corporate lobbying firms, Democrats have also taken thousands of dollars from corporate lobbyists – a move that has thrown him into hot water. In February 2021, Malinowski received about $ 6,000 from former Democratic state lawmaker Vincent Roberti. Roberti runs a firm that lobbied for millions of dollars for Nord Stream 2, the pipeline that would transport national gas from Russia to Germany. The Biden administration contributed to Roberti’s Malinowski campaign a few months before lifting the ban on the controversial project.
Malinowski entered Congress in 2019 when he defeated then-Republican incumbent Leonard Lance by 5 points. Malinowski’s short congressional term, however, is already hotly debated. In his first two years as congressman, Malinowski failed to publish dozens of stock trades worth several thousand dollars, a violation of the stock law, which required members of Congress to report large financial transactions within 30 days. An investigation by the next Office of Congressional Ethics found that Malinowski had “sufficient reason to believe” violating federal law.
The beleaguered Democrat is considered the top Republican target in 2022 and will face a tough re-election bid this November. Malinowski is expected to face former New Jersey Senate minority leader Tom Keane (R.), who is challenging Democrats again after a 1-point defeat in 2020.
Post Tom Malinowski appeared in the first Washington Free Beacon next to his self-imposed corporate PAC ban.