Trending

No tags found
Monday May 23, 2022

The New York Times, Hunter Biden and Media Credibility Suicide

Yes, love New York Post.

Back there in the Stone Age of October 14, 2020 Post The title continues on its front page with a picture of a smiling Hunter Biden next to his smiling father, Joe.

Title, all caps:

Biden Secret E-mail

Just above the headline of the shout was: “Published: Ukrainian executive thanks Hunter Biden for giving him ‘opportunity to meet Vip’s father'”

The Post The story begins with a bold print to emphasize:

Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year ago. Post.

A message of appreciation for the previously undisclosed meeting stated that Vadim Pozarsky, an adviser to the Burisma board, had sent Hunter to Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015, almost a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board on an alleged salary. Up to $ 50,000 per month.

Dear Hunter, Thank you for inviting me to DC and for the opportunity to meet your father. [sic] Some time together. That is the reality [sic] An honor and joy, Read the email

An earlier email from May 2014 also showed that Pozarsky, the so-called 3rd exec of Burismar, had asked Hunter for “advice from the company on how you can use your influence.”

The blockbuster letter – which flew in the face of Joe Biden’s claim that he had “never talked to my son about his foreign business dealings” – contained huge amounts of data recovered from a laptop computer.

This Post It was enough to say the scoop in the middle of a heated presidential campaign between Joe Biden and President Donald Trump.

But eight days later, October 22, 2020, New York TimesIn a story byline by Goldman, headlined:

What we know and don’t know about Hunter Biden and a laptop
President Trump’s allies have campaigned for corruption, targeting the former vice president’s son in an attempt to undermine Biden’s campaign.

This gem a Bar The story goes:

The laptop raises concerns about Russian confusion as the intelligence community warns for months about Russian attempts to influence the election, including spreading confusion about the Biden family. Russia has launched a hacking campaign to find harmful information in the Biden campaign, most notably through a hack of Burisma.

Intelligence officials have also warned the White House that Russian intelligence officials (former NYC Mayor Rudy) are using Mr. Giuliani, who provided the tabloid with a copy of the hard drive, as a carrier to confuse Mr. Biden’s goal of thwarting the presidential race.

Then there was the block from Big Tech. The next day Fox News reported Post Published his blockbuster:

Twitter’s double standard has emerged after the story of NY Post Hunter Biden was blocked, other media have passed, critics say.
“Their goal is to make it as unjust and undemocratic as possible,” said Dan Gainer.

The fox story began: “Twitter has received relentless response after blocking an expansion New York Post Hunter Biden’s highly-critical bombshell on Wednesday, as critics noted that the platform did not show such behavior in CNN’s stories, New York Times And other media, including highly questionable sourcing. “

And now? A year later Times – and others in the mainstream media have tried to disrespect – Post The story? Times This story runs – buried inside page A-20. Title:

Hunter Biden has paid the tax bill, but extensive federal investigations continue
The judiciary’s investigation into the president’s son’s business dealings has remained active, with a grand jury seeking information on payments from around the world.

And, look, the confession buried in this Times story is:

People familiar with the investigation say prosecutors examined emails about Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activities. Those have been received by email New York Times The file cache appears to have come from an abandoned laptop at the Delaware repair shop. Emails and others in the cache were known to them and verified through investigation.

In response Times Filled red face Post This editorial runs, of course, all the way to laughter:

Now Joe Biden’s president, the Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real

The editorial begins:

Forgive the obscenity, but you have to be with us.

First, New York Times More than a year later, Hunter decides that Biden’s business problems are worthy of a story. Then, deep in the part, transient, it notes that Hunter’s laptop is valid.

“People familiar with the investigation say prosecutors have examined emails about Burisma and other foreign business activities among Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others.” Times Wrote: “Received by these emails New York Times The file cache appears to have come from an abandoned laptop at the Delaware repair shop. Emails and others in the cache were known to them and were verified through investigation. “

Proven !!! You don’t say You mean, like, when a newspaper actually reports an issue and doesn’t try to whitewash the coverage for Joe Biden, does it discover that it’s actually true?

Here’s a brief overview New York Times Didn’t go out of his way to investigate reports or information PostIts story. No, Times All the way to the reaction and the “mainstream” media statistics was to poop the post scoop, pretending that it was all infamous rubbish and Russian information.

There could only be one reason: to defend then-candidate Joe Biden. As mentioned, Big Tech went even further, simply blocking the story completely.

Trump’s attorney general, William Barr, has acknowledged the impact of all of this, Fox News reported (as reported). The Epoch Times):

Suppression of Hunter Biden Laptop Story ‘Must’ Affects 2020 Election: Bar

Era Report:

Former Attorney General William Barr said March 17 that massive action against the story of emails and other elements of laptops owned by the son of President Joe Biden has affected the 2020 election.

Later New York Post Materials have been reported, Twitter has blocked the circulation of the story and other news outlets have expressed doubts about the veracity or refused to report on the development, outlining claims that the publication was part of a Russian misleading effort or did not matter.

Barr, who worked under the Trump and George HW Bush administrations, told Fox News that “it certainly had an impact on the election, suppressing that news.”

“It simply came to our notice then. Only the incidents were embarrassing. And most Americans will immediately see what was happening and how disgusting it was and the impact it had. The issue of crime is a different matter, “Barr added.

There was this title later in Breitbart Times fessed up:

Fifteen media figures have claimed that Hunter’s laptop emails were probably Russian propaganda before the New York Times acknowledged them.

Brittbert’s story is also named after journalists from MSNBC, The Daily Beast, and NBC. The Washington Post, Mother Jones And CNN, among others. To a person Post The story was dismissed as “probably Russian propaganda” (CNN), “Russian confusion” (Mother Jones), “Lies” and “probably part of a Russian misleading propaganda” (The Washington Post) And this steadily genuine dis-information campaign from the liberal media continues.

Summarize it all up? What? New York Times And what the rest have done is kill their own credibility as serious journalists or journalism outlets. They deliberately undermined their credibility by suppressing or dismissing an accurate headline story that, yes, indeed, could negatively affect the 2020 presidential election – for Joe Biden. Their favorite candidate.

As Federalist staff writer Jordan Boyd rightly observed:

Despite New York Times Now quietly acknowledging the legitimacy of laptops, don’t expect an apology from them or any other corporate media outlet, pundit, Democrat or Big Tech. They have repeatedly proven that their wrongdoing is not a “flaw” in good-faith journalism that guarantees a “correction” or follow-up story a year and a half later. They will do whatever it takes to empower themselves and their political allies.

Exactly.

Shameful, stupid – and suicidal for their own credibility.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to Top