McCarthy Highlights Need to Target Exclusive, Section 230 Reform

Congress should target monopolies because it advances the Big Tech Act, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) said last week.

“If ninety percent of your search goes through a search engine, is that exclusive? McCarthy asked one time. Interview Thursday. “If you use a platform, and you’re picking and choosing what someone can say on it, you shouldn’t have liability protection.”

McCarthy was one of several lawmakers who spoke at the annual House GOP Retreat hosted by the Congressional Institute at Ponta Vedra Beach in Fla.

In response to a question, McCarthy clarified that these features include Google, Facebook and Twitter.

Bilateral tech antitrust legislation introduced in October will prevent technology platforms from supporting their own products rather than competitors. But the “Big Four” technology companies – including Google and Facebook – spent more than $ 55 million in lobbying last year to stop antitrust legislation. Another bipartisan no-confidence bill aims to promote competition in the app development market. This will require Apple and Google to allow users to download apps from sources other than Apple and Google’s in-house app store.

The pending Section 230 Act includes the 2022 Ethnic Abuse of Elimination and Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination (EARN IT) Act, which would remove the legal impediment of technology companies in the vicinity of content related to alleged child sexual abuse. But skeptics, ranging from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden to self-styled “center-right” American Action Forum (AAF) think tanks, have hinted at greater privacy concerns about the bill. Opposition to the AAF is significant because it has supported censorship in the past. The group has advocated a relaxed approach to immigration.

EARN adopts a different approach from IT law, Rep. Greg Steube’s (R-FL) Curbing Abuse and Saving Express in Technology (CASE-IT) Act will strip unconditional immunity from the civic liability of influential big tech companies in the market, providing legal immunity. Only if these companies control content consistent with the First Amendment, the American Principles Project mentions one-pager.

Before Google became the go-to search engine for Internet users, there were many search engines, McCarthy said. House Republicans want a marketplace that encourages people to create alternative platforms that can compete with companies like Google, he added.

Tech executives generally deny that their programs engage in practices such as censorship and discrimination against certain users, even in private conversations, McCarthy said.

“Every time you bring in one of these CEOs, and talk to them on the phone – I’ll worry – ‘Oh no, Kevin, it’s not really happening. That is not happening. “Oh, it’s an algorithm, so it couldn’t do it,” McCarthy said.

McCarthy detailed the dishonesty of tech CEOs before he testified in Congress when he was the House majority leader.

“And do you know what will happen the night before they testify?” McCarthy recalls. “They gave a press release saying they were sorry, ‘Yes, it happened’.”

Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) is another conservative lawmaker working to curb big tech dictatorship and censorship.

As part of his 11-point plan to rescue America, Scott is proposing that all social media platforms that censor speeches be considered publishers and that legal action be taken. Its plan further suggests that platforms accept users’ consent before using their personal information or giving it to third parties.

Conservatives are being attacked. Contact your local representative and claim that Big Tech provides transparency, clarity about “hate speech” and equal action for conservatives when mirroring the First Amendment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.