Flashback: CNN En Español dismisses NYP Hunter Biden as laptop story

Now that New York Times Hunter has seen and confirmed the content of Biden’s infamous laptop for verification New York Post ‘In the report, it’s important to look back at how CNN En Español dismissed the story, among many other media outlets – thus helping and assisting Big Tech in its attempt to suppress a story that would otherwise have badly damaged Joe Biden in just two weeks since the 2020 presidential election.

View as Anchor Juan Carlos Lopez discontinued his report on October 20, 2020 – five days after the post broke the story and was suspended from Twitter – with this improvement:

As we mentioned at the time, Lopez did not report directly to the laptop. Instead, he linked it to an unrelated report on Russian hacking. This allows him to take the “Russian Confusion” defense further against this explosive story. In fact, Lopez cites “Eastern European” evidence in some of Biden’s laptop documents as evidence of fraud, as opposed to supporting Biden’s transaction with Burisma!

A year and a half has passed and Joe Biden is now safely in the White House because of the organized repression of this story. Now that the Times Hunter has conducted its own verification of Biden’s laptop contents, we hope Lopez will issue an on-air correction and report all.

Click “Expand” to see the full transcript of the aforementioned report aired on CNN En Español on October 20, 2020:

Juan Carlos Lopez, CNNEE: The judiciary has issued a stern warning to Russia over its cyber activity, while the FBI is investigating whether the alleged emails leaked from the son of former Vice President Joe Biden are part of a Russian conspiracy. Campaign and now, we go straight to the news.

It happened this Monday, at the Department of State’s press conference, that they were officials from both the DOJ and one of their agencies, the FBI. Federal law enforcement has announced the filing of charges against six officials of the Russian military intelligence agency known as the GRU. Are they accused? They are accused of being behind cyber attacks against the interests of other countries, but although it was against other countries, they reportedly infected the United States. The warning, issued by one of the highest-ranking officials in the Justice Department, was clear. We were going to listen to the audio, let’s go ahead with the detailed report of the allegations against these people.

John Demers, Assistant U.S. Attorney General for National Security: … No country has armed its cyber powers as maliciously and irresponsibly as Russia, causing unprecedented parallel losses for small strategic gains and gains.

The defendants in this case are all members of the military unit 74455 of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate, an intelligence agency known as the GRU. The department has previously accused members of the same unit of their role in Russia’s attempts to interfere in the 2016 US election, also known as the “Sandworm Team” to cyber security researchers. We do not allege interference in any election here. Rather, today’s allegations explain how the election activities of Unit 74455 were part of the work of a continuous, sophisticated hacking group engaged in sabotaging perceived enemies or adversaries of the Russian Federation …

Lopez: And although they have reiterated that the allegations have nothing to do with the 2020 election, they note that at a time when the FBI is investigating, yes, emails from a computer belonging to Hunter Biden have been leaked and, according to a conservative media outlet, show corruption. Which does not really show it), then, they are announcing allegations against members of the same unit of Russian intelligence who interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

But let’s review the allegation that there are emails in a so-called computer that show the alleged acts of corruption, that when you read the material, they say that it is real but not verified, does not prove anything at all.

On October 14, the New York Post published a so-called “exclusive” article about Hunter Biden, a newspaper owned by Mogul Rupert Murdoch, who also owns the Fox News Network, and alleged that the content came from his personal computer. According to that version, the owner of a computer repair shop in Delaware, former Vice President Joe Biden’s home state, – the owner of the shop is also legally blind – got it from someone he believes to be Hunter Biden … he can’t guarantee that Hunter Biden Lives in California – a laptop in April 2019. According to the person, the person who dropped the laptop disappeared and after 90 days and without any reply from his owner, (the shop owner) became the owner of the laptop. He asserted that his confession had been obtained through torture and that his confession had been obtained through torture. But the man, extremely cautious, made a copy of the materials and sent them to an attorney for Rudy Giuliani, an adviser to President Donald Trump and former personal attorney. Let’s continue. Rudy Giuliani, a key figure in the effort to pressure the Ukrainian government to announce an investigation into Joe Biden and his son Hunter, a request that was acquitted by President Trump’s House impeachment and subsequently in the Senate; The same Rudy Giuliani got a hard drive with Hunter Biden’s personal information. There are more. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to President Trump and publisher of a conservative media outlet, has been released on bail on charges of fraud in an attempt to build a private border wall. They raised about 25 25 million, and the charging document states that they used the funds to maintain their luxurious lifestyle. So, as is well known, Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani gave that material to the New York Post and did not allow anyone else to review the contents of that hard drive, which would allow its source to be verified, much more could be verified. Information

John Ratcliffe, director of National Intelligence, said he did not see any evidence that the material published by the New York Post was related to Russian misleading propaganda. But Ratcliffe, who took office in May this year, is a former Republican congressman who has no intelligence experience but is loyal to President Trump. This is why his credibility is not so strong, even when he works in the intelligence community but the investigation was raised by the FBI, and it is not clear why he was involved in a biased issue.

Facebook and Twitter have limited their reach due to doubts about the authenticity of the material, although Twitter has changed its position.

The materials include an email showing that Hunter Biden, according to this version (of events), introduced Vice President Biden to one of his partners in a Ukrainian firm, either at the White House or on a White House basis. After reviewing the documents, the Biden campaign states that the date does not match and the email lacks important information such as a date, source, and that many of these documents were created in Eastern Europe, the documents that were transferred repeatedly and to that computer. There is widespread suspicion. Now, President Trump has said he is upset and upset that it is not being widely broadcast – which seems to be a pre-election campaign strategy. That’s how he referred to the press – in his usual offensive terms – yesterday, for not going with that version.

President Donald Trump: He is a criminal. He was caught. Read his laptop. Who knows the culprit? You are a criminal for not reporting it. You are a criminal for not reporting it. Let me tell you something, Joe Biden is a criminal and he has been a criminal for a long time and you are a criminal and the media for not reporting it.

Lopez: It would be a crime to report defamatory information. It would be a crime not to do our job. President Trump may be upset, angry, but the information cannot be disclosed if it is not verifiable. There is controversy over freedom of expression and those who think they can say whatever they want. But we, as a media outlet, only report and disclose the information we verify – it would be irresponsible not to do so. For that reason, no matter how many attacks come from the President, that information remains dubious and has little credibility.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.