President Donald Trump is never there to hide what he thinks, and that includes President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court-appointed Ketanzi Brown Jackson.
The former president spoke to the crowd at his rally in Georgia Commerce on Saturday night where he swiped the nominee.
“The left has become so extreme that we now have a Supreme Court nominee who has sworn that he cannot say what a woman is,” she said.
“Even if he can’t say what a woman is. How on earth can he be trusted to say what the constitution is? Former President.
“A group that refuses to accept that men and women are biologically separate, denies all scientific and human history, a group that should not be close to the edge of power,” he said.
“If Judge Jackson can’t even say what a woman is, how can he believe the Constitution!” – President Trump
Stop confirming it -> https://t.co/ioSml4zmfQ pic.twitter.com/ocXTFxKybD
– Brigitte Gabriel (@ACTBrigitte) March 27, 2022
Her comments came days after a Senate nominee heard Brown say she could not define what a woman is.
It was a tough question for Ketanji Brown Jackson after Republican Tennessee Sen. Marsha Blackburn asked him about it.
The senator quoted the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg as saying: Physical differences between men and women, however, are permanent. The two sexes are not fungus. A community with only one gender is different from a community with both. “
The senator then asked Brown, “Do you agree with Justice Ginsberg that there are physical differences between men and women that are permanent?”
“Senator, with respect, I’m not familiar with that particular quote or case, so it’s hard for me to comment on that,” the Supreme Court nominee said before the senator interrupted him and began the conversation, Brown said.
“I would like to get your opinion on this, and you can submit it. Do you interpret Justice Ginsberg’s definition of male and female as male and female?”
Sen. Marsha Blackburn Judge Ketanji Brown asked Jackson to define what a “woman” was in an exciting exchange on the first day of Jackson’s SCOTUS confirmation hearing. Blackburn used the question to make a point about transgender athletes like Leah Thomas. https://t.co/MsjQExba8F pic.twitter.com/4J6gWMwQDE
– Newsweek (@newsweek) March 23, 2022
“Again, because I don’t know the case, I don’t know how to explain it. I have to read the whole thing, “said the nominee.
“Okay. And can you give me a definition of the word ‘woman’?” Dr. Blackburn.
“Can I give a definition?” Brown replied.
“No. I can’t, ”said the nominee.
“You can’t?” Blackburn asked.
“Not in this context. I’m not a biologist, “Brown said.
Senate Majority Leader and Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell had a reason for not voting for him.
“After studying the nominee’s record and seeing his performance this week, I cannot and will not support Judge Jackson for a lifetime appointment to our Supreme Court,” he said in a speech to the Senate. “First, Judge Jackson refused to reject the marginal position that Democrats should try to pack up the Supreme Court. Justice Ginsberg and Breyer had no problem defending this unpopular view and defending their organization. I figured it would be a simple softball for Judge Jackson. But that did not happen. “
“The nominee has suggested that there are two legitimate aspects to this problem,” the minority leader said. He testified that he had a point of view on the matter but would not share it. He mistakenly compared his non-answer to a different, narrower question asked by the former nominee. But Judge Jackson apparently shook his hand. That he would be, ‘Thrilled to be one of many.’ Contrary to the sentiments of Ginsberg and Breyer, the most outspoken pro-court-packing fringe groups desperately wanted the nominee for the vacant post.
He also took up the issue with his position on illegal immigration and other cases where he saw him as soft on crime.
“It’s an area where Judge Jackson’s trial court records provide a lot of information. And it’s worrying, “he said. “Judges routinely give lenient sentences to some of the worst types of offenders that are under the guidelines and at the request of prosecutors. The judge himself, this week, used the term “policy disagreement” to describe the issue. The problem is not just the sentences. It was the judge’s speech in the transcript of the trial and in a creative way he twisted the law. In one instance, Judge Jackson used Covid as an excuse to rewrite a criminal justice reform law from the bench and make it reversible, which Congress refused to do. “
“He did it to reduce the punishment for a fentanyl trafficker when the Americans died in excess,” he said. “Judge Jackson refused to let the senators go through the merits of his argument in certain cases. He just kept saying it was his discretion, and it was our fault for considering him if Congress didn’t like it. There is little explanation for why he uses his discretion that way. Judge Jackson was not convinced that if senators wanted him to be tough on crime, we would have to change the law, strip him of his discretion, and force him to do so. This response seems to confirm that deeply contained personal policy views enter into his jurisprudence. And that’s exactly what the record shows. “
The post Donald Trump Cries Biden’s Supreme Court Nominee