The following article, Biden’s Minority Supreme Court Peak Ketanji Brown Jackson’s History of the Protection of Child Predators, was first published in Big League Politics.
President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson, whom Biden chose only because of his skin color, has a tragic and disturbing history of apologizing to child hunters on the bench.
Sen. Josh Howley (R-MO) wrote a Twitter thread that shared what his office has discovered about his record on protecting child victims, and it’s a shame.
“I’m researching Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record, reading his opinions, articles, interviews and lectures. I noticed a disturbing pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those who victimize children, “Howley wrote.
“Judge Jackson has a pattern that child porn offenders hook off for their heinous crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. He’s been advocating for it from law school. It goes beyond” soft to crime. “I’m concerned it’s a A record that puts our children at risk, “he added.
Howley cites Jackson’s quotes that highlight his dangerous far-left ideology that embraces predators and gives children their undeserved generosity after committing heinous acts.
In the current climate of fear, hatred and retaliation associated with the release of convicted sex offenders, the courts must pay special attention to legislation that “uses The rhetoric of public health and safety rhetoric is to justify, in short, punishment and detention. “Judges should abandon prevention / punishment analyzes that rely on legal intent … and it further evaluates the” excess “of a sex offender’s legal implications of characterization.” In favor of a policy approach, “Jackson wrote.
In another opinion, Jackson claims that a “less-serious child pornography offender” may be motivated to collect child pornography, not because of his or her sexual nature, but because of the “challenge or use of technology” that may be assumed. I mean
“I think you could say that there is one – that a less-important child pornography offender might be involved in the type of communication at the group experience level because of their motivation, challenge, or use of technology. ? They are technically very sophisticated, but they are not necessarily interested in the part of child pornography? He said.
In addition, Jackson said while working on the U.S. Sentencing Commission that he “mistakenly assumed that child pornography offenders were pedophiles” and that he wanted to understand “non-pedophiles of this category who receive child pornography.”
Pointed out in other cases like Hawley United States vs. Hawkins Where Jackson convicted an adult of having child pornography and sentenced him to just three months in prison while the punishment guideline called for the hunter to be sentenced to 10 years in prison. He also pointed to six other cases where Jackson reduced the recommended punishment for various child poachers.
The full Twitter thread posted by Hawley can be accessed Here. He noted that the system was trying to obscure Jackson’s entire record in order to protect him during his impending confirmation as a Supreme Court judge.
“So far, the sentencing commission has refused to return all of Judge Jackson’s records since its inception. In light of what we have learned, this stone must be finished. We must have access to all relevant records, “said Howley.
The fact that someone as incompetent and dangerous as Jackson is being considered for the country’s high court proves that diversity is not a force and that multiculturalism must mean the death of decency, honor and civilization.
Continue reading: Biden’s Minority Supreme Court Peak Ketanji Brown Jackson has a history of protecting child poachers.